Exactly. I’m way more concerned with the collusion of 2 software vendors agreeing not to cannibalize the others business.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Friday, June 3, 2022, 12:12 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: I am not taking pro- or "bashing" sides here. How can any outsourcer agree not to replace product family X with product family Y, and then agree to run a datacenter the way a customer wants? IBM apparently promised BMC they would not unhook their products, and then promised AT&T to do what they wanted ... and apparently what they wanted was to unhook BMC products. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of zMan Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 7:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: IBM ordered to pay $1.6b to BMC https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/31/ibm_ordered_to_pay_16/ Tsk. IBM appears to have been caught red-handed here. -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
