LOL, and you people said I can't read. I actually said OPINION for 5.
On Monday, June 6, 2022, 10:23:26 AM EDT, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu>
wrote:
Item 5 is an opinion, not a fact. Do you know what is in the sealed motions?
Do you know what effect they will have on the final outcome? I expect the
judgement to be overturned, but the Universe often blows away expectations, and
there are a lot of jokers in this deck. Even were I privy to all of the data I
wouldn't be willing to bet on the outcome.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Johnson [00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM ordered to pay $1.6b to BMC
I don't worship anyone or anything. It sets you up for disappointment. What
I've said about IBM is this.
1. They've survived 111 years in a industry that spits out companies like a
baseball player chewing tobacco. Fact.
2. They lead the world in patents. Almost every year. Fact.
3. Their major platform still is the most secure, fastest, and reliable on the
planet and they process the vast majority of important transactions. (all
facts)4. Their lawsuit against GlobalFoundries was reinstated in April. Fact.5.
The lawsuit with BMC will be overturned. Opinion based upon my knowledge of the
law.
On Monday, June 6, 2022, 09:53:37 AM EDT, Mohammad Khan
<mkkha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Gabe,
With freedom of religion guaranteed in this country, you have no business
criticizing what or who Bill chooses to worship.
Regards
MKK
On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 16:29:48 -0400, Gabe Goldberg <g...@gabegold.com> wrote:
>I don't have a dog in this ridiculous fight -- though I've also lived a career
>based on IBM mainframes, including working for IBM. I long ago sold my shares
>because the company was sadly heading downhill. But I'll chime in anyway. I
>was apparently correct because IBM shares are now at about the price where I
>sold, while other tech companies and the broader markets have increased
>greatly. I'm no more an IBM hater than zMan, just also an experienced observer
>over decades.
>
>Bill, are you familiar
>withhttps://secure-web.cisco.com/1eYdTjmJHv89ViLHZLJjfadg4E-unGI2a7JhinaolNTp7KHuaep2IZC_gChShakUjMwGKmhgVnbhl-jOFakqpYYoWJV4oEWVttaFSkMeMkBGYVG6cuIGgxADjCFukXBhDJbRC3jVdsY4KOIiTsnb8-UT1iEYTcMdFimF7on0AIDdGYd9S45aL9emrzrNjkfRQ0jdgcxu5PyqU1VMdkzUqtI-X_hkhbUo-Cc35YEWyKT4GTDKgKw5da5z4ZszBdmikiyVaC3Jstn4iCd-oFCTL16feBUYa0hef7Jxh7bEc1O3_EfCnn4Pxa3zoPQDTICW15w6Bue8-79aoQsjSHSVU9pao6PVjNCNzfQinLKMRyAkvd94yELM7z_eoouzQNFJaVx6kzMVrM24g8rzd-svSIzyKtJBKs9cgd6Qf_LFiWjkALsviZedLGbBr0gFpPhmG/https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FStreisand_effect
> which you've greatly demonstrated? I doubt that everyone on the list would
>have clicked the link zMan supplied but I'm sure that after your tediously
>arguing with the article, everyone has clicked just to see what it's about. So
>if it's misinformation, you've greatly increased its distribution.
>
>Asserting infallibility in predicting outcome of litigation is silly. First,
>you don't have all the facts. Second, you're not qualified on the law. Third,
>you don't know what arguments will be made on the appeal necessary because the
>case has been decided. Fourth, you don't know whether the appeal will be
>accepted. Fifth, if it's accepted, you don't know what appeal judges will
>decide.
>
>You emphasize your qualifications to pontificate on esoteric legal matters
>because 30 years ago you were a cop and back then you were qualified to study
>to be a lawyer? Seriously?
>
>You accuse others of being IBM haters, while you're quite the IBM worshiper. I
>don't see questioning or criticizing IBM as "hating", but your reflexive
>defense of IBM on matters small and large really does come across as worship.
>Ceaselessly arguing that IBM can do no wrong makes your opinions less than
>credible.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
