Are you the TRON guy? If so, everyone needs to google you.
On Monday, June 6, 2022, 10:18:30 AM EDT, Jay Maynard
<jaymayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
You've made your position abundantly clear, Bill.
Now drop it.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 9:14 AM Bill Johnson <
00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I don't worship anyone or anything. It sets you up for disappointment.
> What I've said about IBM is this.
> 1. They've survived 111 years in a industry that spits out companies like
> a baseball player chewing tobacco. Fact.
> 2. They lead the world in patents. Almost every year. Fact.
> 3. Their major platform still is the most secure, fastest, and reliable
> on the planet and they process the vast majority of important transactions.
> (all facts)4. Their lawsuit against GlobalFoundries was reinstated in
> April. Fact.5. The lawsuit with BMC will be overturned. Opinion based upon
> my knowledge of the law.
>
> On Monday, June 6, 2022, 09:53:37 AM EDT, Mohammad Khan <
> mkkha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gabe,
> With freedom of religion guaranteed in this country, you have no business
> criticizing what or who Bill chooses to worship.
> Regards
> MKK
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 16:29:48 -0400, Gabe Goldberg <g...@gabegold.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I don't have a dog in this ridiculous fight -- though I've also lived a
> career based on IBM mainframes, including working for IBM. I long ago sold
> my shares because the company was sadly heading downhill. But I'll chime in
> anyway. I was apparently correct because IBM shares are now at about the
> price where I sold, while other tech companies and the broader markets have
> increased greatly. I'm no more an IBM hater than zMan, just also an
> experienced observer over decades.
> >
> >Bill, are you familiar withhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
> which you've greatly demonstrated? I doubt that everyone on the list would
> have clicked the link zMan supplied but I'm sure that after your tediously
> arguing with the article, everyone has clicked just to see what it's about.
> So if it's misinformation, you've greatly increased its distribution.
> >
> >Asserting infallibility in predicting outcome of litigation is silly.
> First, you don't have all the facts. Second, you're not qualified on the
> law. Third, you don't know what arguments will be made on the appeal
> necessary because the case has been decided. Fourth, you don't know whether
> the appeal will be accepted. Fifth, if it's accepted, you don't know what
> appeal judges will decide.
> >
> >You emphasize your qualifications to pontificate on esoteric legal
> matters because 30 years ago you were a cop and back then you were
> qualified to study to be a lawyer? Seriously?
> >
> >You accuse others of being IBM haters, while you're quite the IBM
> worshiper. I don't see questioning or criticizing IBM as "hating", but your
> reflexive defense of IBM on matters small and large really does come across
> as worship. Ceaselessly arguing that IBM can do no wrong makes your
> opinions less than credible.
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
Jay Maynard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
