Bob Bridges wrote: >It was at length, wasn't it? Sorry, I just felt I had to explain how I got
>into the weird habit. Oh, sorry-my "at length" wasn't a snide remark: it was a notation that I was brutally trimming your post! Trying to find the sweet spot between excessive quoting (looking at far too many of the folks here) and no quoting (also often problematic-those often seem to be the most potentially interesting, and thus the most frustrating). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
