> What happens if the operator enters STOP during the (relatively minuscule) > fraction of time that Rexx, not Assembler is active?
Nothing relevant. > Is there a need for persistent storage accessible by both Rexx and Assembler? Not in this case. Why on Earth would there be a need? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 1:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Some UNIX file usage questions On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:47:49 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > ... >The assembler routine will take as input a delay time in hundredths of a >second (because of STIMER), do a WAIT ECBLIST, and return one of > >'T' -- the time expired >'P' -- the operator entered STOP >'F modify command operand' -- the operator entered MODIFY > What happens if the operator enters STOP during the (relatively minuscule) fraction of time that Rexx, not Assembler is active? Is there a need for persistent storage accessible by both Rexx and Assembler? Is there a way for the operator to send SIGINT (Unix "Modify")? Can Rexx catch it? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
