Very true. Which is why I dislike some of what CA (and likely others) does. Is everybody aware that they "front end" IEEMB838 dynamically? That's one of the things that the CAS9 start in CA Common Services does. And I don't doubt that they do other "incestuous" things. I think I understand why, but I still don't have to like it.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: >>wrap all content supervision (LOAD, LINK, XCTL >>and ATTACH), RTM exit (ESTAE(X), STAE, (E)SPIE and SETFRR) and selected >>schedule (such as IEAMSCHD) service calls. > > As all should understand, very little of this would be considered > supported in any way shape or form and if anything in this realm caused a > problem (or could conceivably have caused a problem), IBM service might > take a hard line about helping. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
