After you made the changes on the HMC did you do a POR then IPL? Thanks Shelia Chalk
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2022 10:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Remote HMC Tony, Assuming you really described all the picture (*) it may be an issue with network rules based on MAC address - that's the only "network thing" you have changed with HMC replacement. (*) it is not honest/dishonest, it is about trust. I trust NO ONE, when analysing IT problems. No one, including me. Nobody's perfect, it is possible to miss some detail. :-) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 13.08.2022 o 03:50, Cieri, Anthony pisze: > Thanks for your reply. > We do appear to have a "network" issue. It is strange because we copied > the configs from the old machine are moved the cables from the old HMC to the > new HMC. One interface work for remote access to the remote HMC. One the > other interface, I can ping the remote gateway and the local HMC, but I > cannot ping the SEs at the local site so the manual installation does not > work. > > We certainly could (add do) use the remote access to the local HMC. We > want to get the remote HMC working for our DR test. > > Thanks again. > Tony > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of > Radoslaw Skorupka > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 5:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Remote HMC > > [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not open > attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious senders. *** ]] > > > Well, as far as I understood you have a problem with connectivity. > 1. Check network connectivity, internal firewalls, rules, etc. > 2. Use "manual object installation" - remote HMC will NOT discover your CPCs. > You have to define it manually, it is not hard. > 3. Domain security. Leave default or check it thoroughly. > > BTW: What do you need actually? > I'm asking, because you wrote about remote HMC, but usually users need remote > access to (local) HMC. I did use both and I have to admit the functionality > available with remote HMC *but not with remote access* to the local HMC is > rather rare. In other words: vast majority of features is available though > remote access. > > Last, but not least: remote access to local HMC is much easier to set up. > > HTH > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > > > W dniu 11.08.2022 o 17:57, Cieri, Anthony pisze: >> Hi List, >> >> I have a new DR machine (BC15) that we have installed in Austin. The >> machine is running and we tested out a DR scenario when we were there. At >> that time , we did NOT have our remote HMC installed. A few week later we >> are now installing our remote HMC and we are having an issue. The HMC do not >> seem to talk to each other. >> >> We have used the same cables and copied the configurations from the >> previous machines. Our remote HMC (Oaks, PA) cannot ping the SEs in Austin, >> however the eth1 interface is up and running. >> >> Has anyone run into this situation?? >> Can you suggest any potential solutions?? >> >> Thanks in advance >> Tony >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
