I would suggest checking your LE parms between the two systems. It almost feels like there is a difference in the setting between to two systems around how CICS is handled.
Paul Feller GTS Mainframe Technical Support From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Crusty Old Guy Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 2:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: COBOL - z/OS 2.1 vs 2.4 I have further information from the programmers. These are CICS programs. The programs do not initialize their working storage. I'm told everything is fine under z/OS 2. 1. Under z/OS 2. 4, they are getting garbage in the COMMAREA. They want I have further information from the programmers. These are CICS programs. The programs do not initialize their working storage. I'm told everything is fine under z/OS 2.1. Under z/OS 2.4, they are getting garbage in the COMMAREA. They want to know why it runs OK under 2.1. I have not found an answer for them in the migration guide. Can anyone help? COG ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
