On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 at 14:55, Pierre Fichaud <[email protected]> wrote:
> After an hour or so of juggling the various parameters for ICHEINTY, I got
> this :
>
> 20.26.08 JOB04490 *IRR401I 0C4 ABEND DURING RACF PROCESSING OF 236
> 236 ALTER REQUEST FOR ENTRY T22TST1
> 20.26.08 JOB04490 IRR401I 0C4 ABEND DURING RACF PROCESSING
>
Did you get a dump and look at it?
> I couldn't get the macro to work with DATAMAP=NEW and RELEASE 1.8.
> I let it default to 1.7 and played with the parameters.
>
> Now I have an abend but I got no SYSMDUMP nor a SYSUDUMP.
>
I guess not... RACF will typically take an SVC dump for an abend in its own
code. But you can always set a SLIP.
> My next step is to set a SLIP trap but I'm waiting to be
> APF-authorized to do this.
>
ICHEINTY generally requires APF auth to start with. How does APF relate to
setting a SLIP?
[...]
3) There is probably something in the generated parameter list that is
> wrong or missing.
> Unfortunately, there is no mapping for the ICHEINTY parameter
> list.
> Can IBM supply a mapping if it exists.
> The doc refers to fields at various offsets.
> I have no idea what to do to fix this problem.
> It's a guessing game - back to #1.
>
Yeah - some RACF data areas just don't seem to have mapping macros. Whether
they really don't, or they are in PL/X only, I've never found out. Most
egregiously, the RACF SMF records don't have mappings, so everyone has to
invent their own.
As for ICHEINTY, the parameter list is at least decribed in detail in the
diagnosis reference section of the Diagnosis book.
Tony H.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
