The big problem with mainframe reporting is the finances compare one year apart while models come out 2 years apart. Useful reporting would be by months since model release.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 4:25 PM Paul Gilmartin <0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:54:31 +0000, Bill Johnson wrote: > > >That’s not going to sit well with the “mainframe is dying” crowd. It will > >still be the best platform in the world long after most of us have retired. > > > But the mainframe traditionalists will cringe at the word "cloud". > > Note that this thread originated because the OP's environment and a supplier > are > lethargic in adding HTTPS to their tools repertoire, preferring to stay with > FTP. > > >On Thursday, October 20, 2022, 4:30 PM, Mark Regan <marktre...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >https://www.networkworld.com/article/3677548/ibm-sales-jump-shows-the-mainframe-is-not-dead-with-hybrid-cloud-alive-and-well.html > > -- > gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
