I would expect the parameter list for HLASM in CDAHLASM have a pointer to options in the first word, and both NOLIST and NOTERM sound plausible.
Maybe you need SYSTERM even if it is ignored? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Jay Maynard [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 8:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMP/E oddity? That behavior is what I would have expected: SMP/E builds a target load module during APPLY by including the CSECTs from what's being APPLYed first, then other APPLYed and not accepted PTFs, then the DLIBs. Since there is information on what PTF supersedes what in the SUP statements, it can proceed this way and produce what you expect. Indeed, I would not expect APPLYing a PTF to use the existing LMOD at all. On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 7:34 AM Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> wrote: > I had a workmate delete a load module from a target library before > reapplying > a PTF that only replaced a few CSECTs. > > Strangely enough, instead of the link failing when trying to include the > original module, it included the CSECTs from the DLIB. > > (1) Is that documented anywhere? > (2) What would have happened if the were unaccepted PTFs? Include from the > previously APPLYed? > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
