I have produced documents for years with xelatex and (lately) luatex (because, imho, those are the only solution that gives typographical freedom, and predictable, constant page layout, and optimal quality. I am keeping that setup probably forever, but am moving to Markdown and pandoc conversion to LateX source, because it works, and makes the sources easily readable (and editable via for example using GitHub or SourceForge) also for incidental collaborators. XML-DocBook solutions I gave up on because low readability and only commercial processors gave quality output - this is the sad story of Apache FOP and a host of DocBook toolchains.
I still keep the skeleton setup as LateX - asciidoc and family, and also pandoc pdf generation just don’t give me that quality. It helps to go requesting commercial publishing houses for their TeX setup files, there is a lot to learn there. I try to use shell escape where possible to guarantee that example code is correct by XeteX having execute them and including the actual output in the document compile. best regards, René. > On 22 Dec 2022, at 14:56, Rupert Reynolds <rreyno...@cix.co.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, 16:47 Rupert Reynolds, <rreyno...@cix.co.uk> wrote: > >> I've been meaning to learn LaTex for years, but it looks very different >> from other markups. I'm off to find a beginners' course now :-) >> >> > And so the first hurdle is passed--install package 'texlive' on Linux and > 'pdflatex' command just works. > > Roops > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN