On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 13:19:41 +0000, Peter Relson wrote: >As the ISV's have been aware for years, z/OS is working to reach the goal of >allowing the ASCB to be above 16M to ... > Underreaching.
> At some point after that, it might be made the default. > Might it even, at some point in the far future, it be made not optional but compulsory? Forking the design multiplies the maintenance burden. > ...SAM24/SAM31 (which, if used, would have happened to avoid the coding > error). > If any control block or code involves 24-bit addresses with flags or noise in the top byte. that must be remedied prior to moving the ASCB. SAM24/SAM31 or "N R,=A(X'00FFFFFF') is a digression from the ultimate goal, counterproductive. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
