Yes, I know that the wording is different depending on the mode. The point isd 
that in no addressing mode does LA clear bits 0-31 to zero.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Paul Edwards [mutazi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 7:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

Those words are not used for AM64.

I am discussing running 32-bit (L/LM/ST/etc) programs in AM64.

BFN. Paul.




On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 00:24:11 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

>"and bits 0-31 remain unchanged" does not mean set to zero.
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>________________________________________
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
>Paul Edwards [mutazi...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 6:47 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32
>
>On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 23:37:16 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
>>The semantics of LA are that it doesn't clear the top half in AM64.
>
>LOAD ADDRESS
>
>LA R�,D�(X�,B�) [RX]
>
>In the 24-bit addressing mode, the address is
>placed in bit positions 40-63, bits 32-39 are set to
>zeros, and bits 0-31 remain unchanged.. In the
>31-bit addressing mode, the address is placed in
>bit positions 33-63, bit 32 is set to zero, and bits
>0-31 remain unchanged. In the 64-bit addressing
>mode, the address is placed in bit positions 0-63.
>
>
>Ergo, LA R3,0 in AM64 will set the entire 64 bits of R3 to 0.
>
>Which is all I need.
>
>And a S/370 instruction.
>
>> Even if you clear the top halves yourself, there are still coding
>> issues for 31-bit addresses in AM64.
>
>Fix the coding issues so that they are AM32/64-clean?
>
>Also they aren't really 31-bit addresses. If an "L" instruction
>is used to load an address, it is a 32-bit address, which will
>suddenly be visible when running in AM64 (or a restored
>360/67 running as AM32).
>
>BFN. Paul.
>
>
>
>>--
>>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>
>>________________________________________
>>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
>>Paul Edwards [mutazi...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 6:24 PM
>>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>Subject: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32
>>
>>On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 23:22:00 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>> And given that the high 32 bits are required to be 0, by convention,
>>>
>>>Where do you see that?
>>
>>That was my first message in the last 24 hours.
>>
>>Do an LA on program entry, for all undefined registers.
>>
>>Maybe I should have said "proposed convention". I'm happy
>>to switch semantics to whatever is less confusing.
>>
>>BFN. Paul.
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to