BSAM really isn't that hard, and I didn't see any errors that he didn't correct. I don't know why he's running AC(1), but I also don't know why it's acting as though he had FIX=USER. If I had access I'd be looking at the relevant control blocks.
Are both IEZIOB and IGGIOBEX available for customer use these days? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Does BSAM I/O area have to be fixed storage On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:03:50 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Seymour “respectfully ” that’s for QSAM in locate mode BSAM doesn’t have a >locate mode the user supplied the I/O area > My (very old) experience with BSAM agreed with what Seymour says. Why are you trying to use BSAM. QSAM is easier. o Are your records not in a RECFM supported by QSAM? o Are you concerned with the performance of repeatedly calling GET LOCATE? o Did you make a bad initial design choice and are unwilling to reconsider? >> On Mar 23, 2023, at 9:40 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> >> The access method handles page fixing unless you specify DCBE FIX=USER. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
