Matt Hogstrom wrote: >I don't believe AI "learned" anything but rather adjusted the >algorithms based on a set of changes in probability of what >the algorithm has ingested and processed for its LLM.
So now we're really getting into epistemology: is that not what 'learning' comprises? That's a real question, not a challenge--I'm honestly not sure, though I think I could argue that it is (and perhaps that it isn't)! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
