Yes, but what is the threshold that we must cross before"AI" becomes a reality rather than an aspiration? In the early days, we were 5 years away; in retrospect, that was unduly optimistic.
On the flip side, does anybody remember the shockingly simple ELIZA <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA>, which fooled many people? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Phil Smith III [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 4:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AI wipes out humanity? Matt Hogstrom wrote: >I don't believe AI "learned" anything but rather adjusted the >algorithms based on a set of changes in probability of what >the algorithm has ingested and processed for its LLM. So now we're really getting into epistemology: is that not what 'learning' comprises? That's a real question, not a challenge--I'm honestly not sure, though I think I could argue that it is (and perhaps that it isn't)! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
