Well, some mainframe compilers require a different code page for
special characters they require, so anybody using the compiler might
need a REXXPLI or REXXAPL version.

On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:47 PM Paul Gilmartin
<0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:12:46 -0500, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:40 PM David Crayford wrote:
> ><deleted>
> >>     ... Oh well, that’s life dealing with the major suckage that is EBCDIC!
> >>
> >You could create a patch for the most common EBCDIC code page
> >(US.-ENG), then modify and test for other code pages.
> >
> Stay with IBM-1047, preferred by z/OS UNIX and supported by autoconversion.
> Don't nurture "major suckage".
>
> But what about the  '¬'?
> If I copy-and-;aste it from regina.pdf it doesn't work as a negator, and:
>     say c2x( '¬' )
>     C2AC
> (It works if I translate it to IBM-1252.)  Text in manuals should Just Work
> when copied into programs.
>
> --
> gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to