+1

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 05:31, Doug Shupe <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 and more
>
> Stay Safe
>
> > On May 22, 2023, at 19:19, Ramsey Hallman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I agree whole-heartedly with Mike and Charles.
> >
> > Ramsey Hallman
> > MVS/Quickref Support Group
> > Chicago-Soft, LTD.
> >
> >> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 5:34 PM Mike Shaw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I have been working with IBM z/OS documentation for over 40 years and
> have
> >> submitted many reader comment forms in that time. In that time I have
> found
> >> and reported typographical errors, inconsistencies, obsolete
> information,
> >> and even flat-out WRONG statements.
> >>
> >> Without real-world feedback from z/OS professionals who actually USE the
> >> documentation, it's accuracy and usability will not improve.
> >>
> >> IBM has good technical documentation writers but they are NOT end-users.
> >>
> >> Eliminating RCFs disconnects authors of the documentation from
> consumers of
> >> the documentation...NOT a good idea.
> >>
> >> Mike Shaw
> >> MVS/QuickRef Support Group
> >> Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
> >>
> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2023, 6:05 PM Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For those who have not been following this discussion, IBM is on track
> to
> >>> remove the RCF process as we have known it for forty or so years.
> >> Customers
> >>> and ISVs will be limited to a Web pop-up “Was this helpful?” and if you
> >>> answer No, you will be able to briefly justify that answer. There is
> also
> >>> apparently now no path whatsoever for a customer to open a requirement
> >>> against IBM documentation.
> >>>
> >>> We need a way to provide formatted suggestions for improvements,
> >>> clarifications or corrections to IBM manuals.
> >>>
> >>> If you would like that, then wishing and hoping and grumping will not
> >> make
> >>> it happen. Here is what might make it happen:
> >>>
> >>> - You could start by replying with a simple +1 to this post. The IBM
> >>> powers that be do not participate in this forum, but there is strong
> >>> evidence that what happens here sometimes percolates in that direction.
> >>> - You could vote for Peter Farley’s RFE. Find it here:
> >>>
> >>
> https://ibm-z-hardware-and-operating-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/ZOS-I-3691
> >>> (apologies for any fold).
> >>> - If you have an IBM rep at your shop, you could let him or her know.
> If
> >>> you simply know an IBMer you could tell him or her nicely.
> >>> - If you have contacts who are responsible at your shop for other
> >> products
> >>> such as the languages, Db2, CICS, MQ and so forth, you could try to get
> >>> them to chime in. Apparently one of the pushbacks from the
> documentation
> >>> team is “IBM has 1200 products and our process works fine for all of
> >> them –
> >>> what’s wrong with you z/OS people?”
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>> Charles
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
Mike Shorkend
[email protected]
Tel: +972524208743

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/MikeShorkend/>

<https://twitter.com/mikeShorkend>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to