As far as I understand the question is:
some PTF has ACTION, but it was superseded by newer PTF which does NOT
have the ACTION.
Is it possible? IMHO yes.
Should you perform the ACTION? IMHO no. No, because it is possible
someone received newer PTF, but not superseded one. In that case he
would see only HOLDSYS assigned to the newer PTF. Which means the ACTION
is not needed, otherwise it would be also assigned to the newer PTF as
well.
My €0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 01.06.2023 o 14:13, Allan Staller pisze:
Classification: Confidential
Short version. Yes. Many times the same action hoid will be repeated multiple times for
each ptf in that particular "chain".
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
Munif Sadek
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 8:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: HOLD Action of a superseded PTF
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
My SMP APPLY CHECK has multi pages of ++ HOLDSYS ACTION items but APPLY only a
couple.
Do I have to take HOLDSYS Action of the Superseded PTFs as reported in the
APPLY CHECK SMP Report but not listed in the APPLY JOB SMP report?
regards
Munif.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
