Touche. But zEnterprise is a superset of System z, not a distinct architecture, isn't it?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Dave Barry <dba...@ups.com> wrote: > Ahem... Did you mean to say zEnterprise? System z is so last year. ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of zMan > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 9:56 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Crypto Facility performance. > > zSeries doesn't support Protected Key. Oh, wait,you probably *really* > meant System z. It's been eight years, time to upgrade your terminology, eh? > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Tim Henness <ibmm...@henness.org> wrote: > with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
