Of me Paul Gilmartin wrote: <begin extract> In some cases when someone has espoused a practice or point of view that you judge to be anomalous, you characterize him as an "intelligent Martian". </end extract>
This is true; but it misses the point, at least in part. I (and others) have used this epithet to characterize an ahistorical point of view, one that reflects or appears to reflect radical ignorance of what has been. Even the disagreeable past is prologue. Moreover, there is a substantive difference between characterizing an opinion as that of an intelligent Martian and attempting to interdict the expression of that opinion. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
