This list is becoming like Tik Tok. Enough. On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:37 PM Lance D. Jackson < [email protected]> wrote:
> UNSUBSCRIBE- I'm OUT! You guys go on far too long about stories no one > else is interested in. You should consider taking these drawn out > discussions offline. > > > On 07/09/2023 15:56 EDT Leonard D Woren <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > What was the first OS that you had a 2 MB TSO region? What hardware. > > > > MVT TSO on the 4 MB 360/91 at UCLA was about 3/4 MB . There was a lot > > you could do, although it was slow. I did experiment with overlay > > modules though. Bleah. > > > > The reason you could do a lot in 3/4 MB is that it was done in > > efficient languages, like Assembler. None of these modern bloatware > > languages that make every app on my phone 32 MB minimum, and often up > > to 500 MB. > > > > /Leonard > > > > > > Seymour J Metz wrote on 9/7/2023 3:32 AM: > > > I never had TSO in less than 2 MiB; 768 KiB gives me shudders. > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on > behalf of Clem Clarke <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 6:38 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: Is the IBM Assembler List still alive - Dumps - Early days > > > > > > > > > Running TSO in 3/4 of a meg was interesting. And VERY slow. > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
