AC(1) is only relevant with ATTACH RSAPF=YES, and AFAIK nobody but the Initiayor and the TMP does that.
________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 9:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SCHEDIRB I did get an abend after SVC 8 in the code that ran the IRB the module was not linked AC=1 > On Sep 28, 2023, at 9:11 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jon P wrote > <snip> > I believe that LOAD will abend if the module is not linked with the AC=1 > attribute when running authorized. > </snip> > > It will not. You should have AC=1 only for a module that is the target of > something akin to EXEC PGM= (i.e., the jobstep program). It's easier to obey > this rule than to ensure that unnecessarily-marked AC=1 modules properly > protect system security/integrity. The module would need to be in an > APF-authorized library/concatenation. > > <snip> > TSO does SVC screening to protect itself from SUP and non-KEY8 security > exposures. > </snip> > > That seems quite unlikely to me. But you could be right. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
