The function not provided by Metal C is basically all of C++. The called module is written in, and exploits, C++.
Charles On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 21:26:18 +0000, Farley, Peter <peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote: >OK, I sort of understand the “personal preference” about not using inline >assembler (it is kludgey, I agree) and somewhat understand the concern about >the “unsupported” aspect of retrieving register contents at entry, but if that >is the case why not use MetalC where you have much more control of the entry >and exit logic, and could easily provide your own version of the prolog that >guaranteed access to the contents of R0? Is there some C library routine that >is not provided by MetalC that you would need in your Rexx external function? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
