We just created new paging volumes, PAGEAD them, updated IPL member,
PAGEDEL the old volumes.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:32 PM Allan Staller <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Classification: Confidential
>
> From the APAR numbers, they are ancient and most likely do not apply to
> ans z/OS system (OS 390 or earlier perhaps).
> That coed is undoubtedly in the JES3 and Jes3/Plus base. I would not worry
> about them.
>
> One other thing. TDMF can move inactive page datasets. It will refuse to
> touch an in-use page dataset.
>
> The last time I did a DASD migration, I defined temporary page datasets
> and used pageadd/pagdel commands to move the paging activity.
> After the original page datasets had been moved, I repeated the process to
> go back to the original page datasets.
>
> HTH,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf
> Of Michael Watkins
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 11:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: JES3plus & TDMF
>
> [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust
> the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing
> email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
>
> Apologies for the double listing to anyone who's also seen this on the
> JES3-L LISTSERV.
>
> The government agency that employs me has three z/OS LPARs (V2R5) running
> on a z15 server. The lone mainframe storage subsystem is a non-replicated,
> channel-attached DS8886. This has never been a JES2 installation and
> Phoenix Software’s JES3plus is now installed. While the JES3 initialization
> deck has DEVICE statements for all tape drives, it has not contained a
> DEVICE statement for a DASD address in over a decade. In other words, DASD
> allocation is not managed by JES3.
>
> The DS8886 will soon be replaced by a DS8950F. TDMF software will be used
> to migrate the contents of the DS8886 to the DS8950F. I believe that TDMF
> can move the JES3 SPOOL volumes, the SYSRES volumes, the page packs and the
> DASD volumes where the coupling facility resides without issues. A
> co-worker insists that all of the LPARs must be brought down, separately,
> so that each LPAR’s ‘sensitive’ volumes can be moved from another LPAR.
>
> IBM documents state: ‘JES3 considerations: In order to ensure that JES3
> system defined volumes will migrate (not required for a Point-In-Time
> migration) in a TDMF (or P/DAS) environment, APARs OW23271, OW28455, and
> OW28457 must be applied. These APARs provides JES3 DDR support for P/DAS
> and therefore, will allow the swapping of volumes. Important: All systems
> sharing devices where JES3 manages the devices must be involved in the TDMF
> session running. This ensures that all JES3 internal tables are properly
> updated. Failure to do so will cause unpredictable results. It is
> recommended that the user check the UCB for the following bit prior to
> copying volumes in a JES3 environment: UCBJ3DV - device is defined to JES3.
> If the bit is off, TDMF will migrate the volume(s) with no errors. If the
> bit is on, TDMF will make the appropriate calls to JES3 to notify JES3 of
> the volume redirection needed.’
>
> Since the DASD volumes at this installation are not managed by JES3, I
> don’t think these APARs are an issue. However, to assuage my co-worker’s
> fears, I’d like to see whether the corresponding PTFs have been applied.
> Unfortunately, I cannot find the PTFs that correspond to any of them.
>
> Question: What PTFs correspond to APARs OW23271, OW28455, and OW28457?
>
> Also, I’m not sure how to display the UCBs involved to verify that the
> UCBJ3DV flag indicates that the volumes are not managed by JES3. Any help
> you can provide on would be appreciated, particularly on how to use either
> UCBSCAN or UCBLOOK macros.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ::DISCLAIMER::
> ________________________________
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
> intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain
> viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without
> referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator
> or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this
> email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the
> views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction,
> dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or
> publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized
> representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before
> opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and
> other defects.
> ________________________________
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to