I happened across this loaded module in a dump from a z/OS 2.5 system: EP....... *IED*CMSGT MAJOR.... EDC40264
ENTPT.... ACF34740 RRBP..... 00000000 USE...... 0000 SP....... 00 Reenterable. Reusable. APF library. and thought eh? IED is (was) the module/msg prefix for TCAM. But it's an alias for EDC40264 in CEE.SCEERUN (in linklst), so presumably LE, and better parsed as "I EDC MSGT". But where do the LE folks get off sticking an I in front of their module prefix? Or is this some "legitimate" faking out of an ancient TSO/TCAM module? The content looks to be related to TSO language support, but surely TCAM was already gone when that came in (and was later whittled down to ENU and JPN). 2CF34740 00000003 C5D5E440 40404040 2CF34768 | ....ENU .3.. | 2CF34750 E4C5D540 40404040 2CF34788 D1D7D540 | UEN .3.hJPN | 2CF34760 40404040 2CF347A8 00001388 0000252F | .3.y...h.... | Well there are two IED modules in LPALIB, so perhaps TCAM is still hanging in there at the 0.01% level... :-) Anyway, not a problem - just curious. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
