I chain backward as its the only way to do it wrapping around tcbrbp and next rb had the registers in the prefix it had SVC 12 maybe SVC 42 issued that Thank you > On Jan 17, 2024, at 4:02 PM, Peter Relson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip>sdawgrsv wasn’t in either TCB regs or rb regs</snip> > If you had done what I written, you would have looked at all the relevant > RBs, not only at a single RB.You apparently looked at the oldest RB. That > sounds like it was the RB associated with the "mainline". Did you look at the > next-oldest RB? > TCBRBP points to the newest RB. RBLINKB navigates to the next older > RB.RBLINKB of the last RB points to the TCB. I'm sure you know that. > > If you're looking within an ESTAE than look at the RB's I suggested. > Peter Relsonz/OS Core Technology Design > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
