Gerhard Adam wrote: >This entire problem is suspect since the PSW itself isn't valid. There is no >situation of where bits 24-31 can contain an x'E1'
Good catch. Even after reading my Principle of Operations, it is still a good catch :-) Of course, the OP discovered later that 'dump analyser picked up the wrong PSW '. I wish the OP published the CORRECT dump results including the PSW and the registers. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
