On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 04:27, Attila Fogarasi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Enterprise PL/I added a NOPROCESS parm option which causes all *PROCESS to
> be ignored.  This was quite a few years ago so should be in your PL/I
> compiler version.
>

Not sure if that's of any use:

Under the NOPROCESS option, the compiler will flag any *PROCESS statement
with an E-level message.

You might want to pre-process the source with SORT to make a transient
change to the source, something along the lines of

//*********************************************************************
//PLIOPT  EXEC PGM=SORT
//*
//SORTIN    DD DSN=&DATA(PXEP&PLIVER.Z),
//             DISP=SHR
//*
//SORTOUT   DD DSN=&&PLIZOS,
//             DISP=(,PASS),
//             UNIT=&DASD,
//             SPACE=(TRK,(1,1),RLSE),
//             DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,BLKSIZE=27920)
//*
//SYSIN     DD *
 INREC IFTHEN=(WHEN=(1,10,CH,EQ,C'   map    '),
               OVERLAY=(2:C'no')),
       IFTHEN=(WHEN=(1,10,CH,EQ,C'   offset '),
               OVERLAY=(2:C'no')),
       IFTHEN=(WHEN=(1,10,CH,EQ,C'   storage'),
               OVERLAY=(2:C'no'))
 OUTREC FIELDS=(1,72,8X)
 SORT FIELDS=COPY
//*
//SYSOUT    DD &OUTSORT
//*********************************************************************
//EPLIZOS EXEC CLHHEP,OBJ='',LI='00',ID=
//IBMZPLI.PLISTD DD DSN=&&PLIZOS,
//             DISP=(OLD,PASS)
//IEWL.SYSLIN  DD
//          DD *
 ALIAS EQ01
 NAME EQ0137(R)


>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 8:14 AM Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I failed to say that the basic problem is that it seems that *PROCESS
> > seems to unconditionally override PARM=. I am looking for a way to
> override
> > *PROCESS with PARM=.
> >
> > Charles
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:46:55 -0500, Charles Mills <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >This is one of those things where the surrounding details are what they
> > are, and would be a distraction if posted here. Please trust me, the
> > situation is what it is.
> > >
> > >I have a PL/I source file that includes *PROCESS TEST(BLOCK,SYM); Let's
> > pretend that cannot be changed.
> > >
> > >Is there anything I can code on PARM= to force the SEPARATE sub-option
> of
> > TEST?
> > >
> > >z/OS Enterprise PL/I 6.1.
>

-- 
Robert AH Prins
robert(a)prino(d)org
The hitchhiking grandfather <https://prino.neocities.org/index.html>
Some REXX code for use on z/OS
<https://prino.neocities.org/zOS/zOS-Tools.html>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to