> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 8:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: B37 för FTINCL in ISPF for userid.ISPnnnnn.SPFTEMPn.WORK > datasets > > In > <a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628f2a315...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se > >, > on 05/22/2013 > at 01:42 PM, Thomas Berg <[email protected]> said: > > >> In > >> > <a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628c16e53...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet. > >> se > >> >, > >> on 05/20/2013 > >> at 09:25 PM, Thomas Berg <[email protected]> said: > >> > >> >===> I think that part of this disagreement is that most of my > >> >opponents here is, more or less, sysprogs. And as such they > haven't > >> >experienced the amount of time needed and lost at space allocation > >> >problems that lots and lots of jobs and applications are > generating. > >> > >> Au contraire, the systems programmers will almost always see lots of > >> space problems, most the results of ignoring documented procedures. > > >Then why do the answers to my diatribe looks like they don't see this > >as a problem ? > > Why is the Moon made of green cheese? Nobody claimed that it wasn't a > problem, just that you have not correctly assigned the blame.
There is a problem that is solved by a simple solution, the one that I proposed IBM should do. The suggested blames and solutions presented here wasn't appropriate to solve the problem. (Unless an extreme overallocation can be seen as a solution.) Regards Thomas Berg ____________________________________________________________________ Thomas Berg Specialist z/OS\RQM\IT Delivery SWEDBANK AB (Publ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
