On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 21:20:18 +0000, Farley, Peter wrote: >Re: “. . . when initiation was changed so PGM=IEFBR14 might bypass some >recalls . . .”, can you cite a reference for that change? I never heard of >any such change in the behavior of step allocation, whether PGM=IEFBR14 or >not. Many of us out here in application land heavily depend on the recall >behavior in production as well as in test jobs. > Redbook: International Technical Support Organization z/OS Version 1 Release 11 Implementation March 2010
11.4 IEFBR14todeletewithoutrecall........................................ 247 11.4.1 Deletingmigrateddatasets ....................................... 248 -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
