Esteem took the words out of my mouth what I’m looking for What is called RFE request for enhancement
Maybe a parm on the SETSSI DELETE,PROG= > On Aug 11, 2024, at 9:29 AM, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Doesn’t that require an ipl > >> On Aug 11, 2024, at 7:35 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> ,I have found this thread interesting, and what I believe is needed >> is a SSI ROLLBACK or UNDO function. So that in the ESTAE/ESTAEX routine >> or in the init routine itself the "system" would remove any changes made >> SSCVT, SSVT, Remove the SSID etc. >> . >> This may not help the original poster with respect to a Resource >> Manager..Paul >> . >> >> ---------- Original Message ---------- >> From: Colin Paice <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Resource manager for subsystem >> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 08:31:52 +0100 >> >> I'm a bit rusty in this area. >> >> From the subsystem vector table (SVCCT?) there is an anchor field for your >> subsystem use. I assume that you are using this to anchor all of the >> storage you allocate, and set flags on anything you change. >> >> While you are debugging your code, you could have something in your >> initialisation code which checks these fields and resets them. >> If in debug_mode then >> do >> if my anchor -> a storage block I allocated then >> do >> ?wto "releasing my block " >> ? storage release... >> end >> if anchor.lockobtained then >> do >> ?wto "releasing the lock" >> ?... >> end >> /* start with a clean system...*/ >> The same logic could be done if you are using name token services to store >> pointers >> >> Colin >> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 02:17, Joseph Reichman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Gut voch >>> >>> I’m debugging a subsystem so I run the init >>> It allocates resources latch CSA and other things >>> >>> Would be nice if I want start from scratch that I don’t have to ipl >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>>> On Aug 10, 2024, at 3:13 PM, Binyamin Dissen < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:40:20 -0400 Joseph Reichman >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> :>In deleting a subsystem is there a way to clean up storage that the >>> initialization routine established such as CSA >>>> >>>> :>I guess I could always do an ATTACH on the subsystem initialization >>> routine and >>>> :>And have a RESMGR for that TCB >>>> >>>> Do you have your init routine waiting for a shutdown request? Really bad >>> idea. >>>> :>Just wondering if there was a simpler way >>>> >>>> :>When I do a SETSSI DELETE the CSA that the initialization routine >>> acquires remains there >>>> >>>> What are you concerned about? >>>> >>>> The init routine failing? If so, a simple ESTAE(X) should be able to do >>> the >>>> cleanup. >>>> >>>> When removing your subsystem? Why not simply do it from there? >>>> >>>> What problem are you trying to solve? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> >>>> http://www.dissensoftware.com >>>> >>>> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
