The event notification was what I was looking for > On Aug 14, 2024, at 10:17 AM, Scott Ballentine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:40:45 +0300, Binyamin Dissen > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "FORCE - For the SETSSI DELETE command, a required parameter that specifies >> that the subsystem is to be removed. This command should be used with care, >> as >> removing a subsystem may result in loss of system function." >> >> One wonders what the "loss of system function" is. >> >> That is why I advised changing on letter to something that wouldn't be in a >> real subsystem. That way the hash function will still pass thru it but not >> match. >> >> Of course, the function codes in the SSVT should be disabled. > > The "loss of system function" isn't referring to subsystem name hashing (and > the SETSSI DELETE command should take care of that kind of cleanup anyway). > That statement is really referring to whatever function the subsystem > provides - so if you delete some really important subsystem that you need to > run the system, you might not have a usable system anymore. Also, not every > subsystem supports being added dynamically, so if you delete one of those > subsystems, you're out of luck. > > Scott Ballentine ([email protected]) > z/OS MVS Development > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
