On 9/19/2024 10:33 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Ah, here's a thought: since one of the first things we do via https is just a GET, a telnet to port 443 would actually appear to connect if AT-TLS is in place, yes? Now, that requires the customer to have telnet available on z/OS, but that's not a crazy requirement. And it's "free".
Telnet got a bad rap many years ago due to some successful off-platform hacks and many shops have disabled it everywhere, including z/OS.
We use ssh on all systems. No telnet. -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
