Last time I checked DROP is an assembler directive
Sent from my iPhone No one said I could type with one thumb > On Oct 1, 2024, at 16:29, Steve Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes the subject is correct. > > I just ran into this situation. Program is in production. > > Multiple points in this program do the following: > > > B DROPR11 > > Now, a few screens away we have this: > > > DROPR11 DROP R11 > LA R1,xxxxx (or something similar) > > The DROPR11 above gets flagged with an invalid label > > The various B DROPR11 statements resolve to the LA R1xxxx > > Anyone see a problem with this? When did this kind of thing get accepted? > > I would have figured that invalid label would have gotten at least an RC=8 > > And every one of those "Branch" instructions would have been flagged for an > undefined label or some such. > > > An inquiring mind would like to know. > > Regards, > Steve Thompson > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
