I see the same issue on VSE 6.2 HLASM R6.0 2024/10/02 01.33
0025F0 47F0 9098 02604 2194 B TONYXXX
0025F4 9120 D064 00064 2195 TM TMR4FLG1,FLG1MSG6
0025F8 47E0 9090 025FC 2196 BNO TU_PUB_R15
2197 TU_PUBJCFLG TEINDUMP PUBJCFLG
0025FC 2198 TU_PUB_R15 DS 0H
2199 *TONY*
0025FC 91F8 2007 00007 2200 TM PUBJCFLG,PUBDVCUP
002600 4780 91C6 02732 2201 BZ TU_DEVICE_DOWN
2202 TONYXXX DROP R2
** ASMA165W UNEXPECTED NAME FIELD
** ASMA435I RECORD 1137 IN SYSIPT ON VOLUME:
002604 2203 TU_CHK_DEVINF DS 0H
Tony Thigpen
Steve Thompson wrote on 10/1/24 5:29 PM:
Yes the subject is correct.
I just ran into this situation. Program is in production.
Multiple points in this program do the following:
B DROPR11
Now, a few screens away we have this:
DROPR11 DROP R11
LA R1,xxxxx (or something similar)
The DROPR11 above gets flagged with an invalid label
The various B DROPR11 statements resolve to the LA R1xxxx
Anyone see a problem with this? When did this kind of thing get accepted?
I would have figured that invalid label would have gotten at least an RC=8
And every one of those "Branch" instructions would have been flagged for
an undefined label or some such.
An inquiring mind would like to know.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
