Mark, Even had a LARGE customer argue we should rewrite our software in 24bit ...because he didn't understand 32 bit LE ,heaps and run options .....
Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means' On Jun 3, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 23:58:34 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In >> <985915eee6984740ae93f8495c624c6c2318055...@jscpcwexmaa1.bsg.ad.adp.com>, >> on 05/31/2013 >> at 03:40 PM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[email protected]> >> said: >> >>> The problem with recompilation is not purely technical though. ISTM >>> that there is far more bureaucracy needed to monitor and guarantee >>> successful completion of full regression testing at each >>> recompilation than there is payback from using notionally "better" >>> translators and runtimes at a given stage. >> >> Yes, additional regression checking is expensive. However, how do you >> validate a new release or service level of the compiler without it? >> What do you do when you roll a new release of the compiler into >> production and discover six months later that you can't compile a >> module that you need to update? Sometimes pay now is less expensive >> than pay later. > > I supposed I could see a small shop, or a development shop / vendor > that would do this. But I don't know that I've ever been in a production > shop that did. There is no way it would ever happen in the larger > ones I've been at. My current client must have a few hundred thousand > COBOL programs (batch / CICS mostly) and the cost to test after > compile even 10% of them would far far out weigh whatever cost of fixing > a program or programs that had a problem 6 months down the line. > In my experience, those have been few and far between anyway (although > I admit I am not in the loop for many application issues). > > As far as validation, there is plenty of activity on a daily basis to point > to a new compiler when we are ready to and then cut over to it being > the default once everyone is comfortable. > > I have been at shops that did it "one application system at a time" to > migrate from COBOL II to Enterprise V3, but that was the last time > all programs were compiled and tested for any given application. > No one wants to do that again! > > Mark > -- > Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS > mailto:[email protected] > Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html > Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
