Joel Ewing wrote, in part: >What is allowed and sometimes useful in current versions of Linux and >Windows is almost any other arbitrary standard Unicode glyph in file >and path names, represented in UTF-8.
UTF-8 or -16? Microsoft seems to prefer UTF-16 in many things that I've seen. A raw disk dump would answer this instantly, of course; Norton Utilities, anyone? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
