On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 13:40:45 -0400, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote:
>Then I would of gotten a s0c4 ( was running key 0 ) >While ikjefld3 was executing What makes you think a S0C4 is guaranteed in your IKJEFLD3 with a bad address? Since we haven't seen your code, we don't know how you are using the address. You saw an S878 instead of S0C4 from storage release. There are many ways a S0C4 will be hidden or avoided. One such way is through PC routines (in this case STORAGE RELEASE). Rarely will you see a S0Cx abend from a PC routine unless you look at a dump. You just panicked every vendor. Screw up as much as you want in key 8 but you NEVER allow storage overlays in key 0. Vendorss get blamed for someone else's screwup. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
