i know how it seems to you, but I was more concerned with the facts on the ground than I was with your preconceptions/
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Jon Perryman <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 9:54 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of an S-con for a long displacement? External Message: Use Caution On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:28:00 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >No building of instructions. My solution allowed for a short read only >parameter instead of a long code sequence. So instead of passing an LA instruction or building the LA instruction or better yet passing the actual address, you chose to convert the BDDD to extract the Base register, shift it and calc it's position in the savearea to get the base and then extract displacement DDD to be added to the register. Seems like an unnecessary and long sequence to me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
