While the technical errors were glaringly obvious, I lacked familiarity wit 
Waterloo geography.

SCRIPTW may have been Waterloo's most important contribution, it was far from 
the only important one.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
Phil Smith III <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2025 11:33 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 3420 environmentals?


External Message: Use Caution


Seymour J Metz wrote:
>Ah, the 360/75 at Waterloo. Besides being the home of some truely
>useful software (thanks, Bruce), I remember it because of an awful
>novel involving a human level AI running on that machine. It was
>considered a large machine at the time, but still grossly underpowered
>by today's standards and obviously not up to the task.

The Adolescence of P1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adolescence_of_P-1

I read that when I was still working there. While I didn't hate it, I was 
painfully aware that it was being wildly optimistic about
the programming. He also got the bloody highway numbers wrong, which was just 
sloppy, and made it clear that he hadn't actually ever
been to Waterloo.

Heh: "...20,000 mainframes with a total of 5,800 MB". So much memory! /s

We had 3MB on the /75: one of real core and two of solid-state. A big machine 
indeed.

P.S. Yes, Waterloo Script was amazing stuff. And Bruce is an all-around nice 
guy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to