Google for "Don't call me Shirley". It's a classic line from a classic movie.

-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
David Crayford <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 7:30 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Product build using CMS vs TSO Was: Pipelines = you don't 
understand z/OS


External Message: Use Caution


> On 10 Sep 2025, at 07:23, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Shirley you know

Are you using voice to text :)

> that not only is that not true but that IEBUPDATE and IEBUPDTE have nothing 
> to do with VM service.
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
> נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> Jon Perryman <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 4:34 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Product build using CMS vs TSO Was: Pipelines = you don't 
> understand z/OS
>
>
> External Message: Use Caution
>
>
>> On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:42:28 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Right of the bat, that process works at the granularity of an entire member.
>> With XEDIT it's easy to have multiple people testing changes to the same
>> member with a merge process that's normally very quick.
>
> Surely you must know that IEBUPDTE / VMFUPDAT is considered unreliable for 
> critical system components when trying to allow multiple users changing a 
> member at the same time. Maybe things have changed but I suspect not. 
> IEBUPDTE & VMFUPDAT existed for decades and product build never implemented 
> the process.
>
> It requires the developer consider every change since the source was pulled. 
> It's much simpler to come to an agreement than chasing down changes. If 
> IEBUPDTE was the solution, then it could be used.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to