No, that is not the issue I have. We are receiving large XMIT datasets from an ISV which require large amounts of DASD, greater than a 3390-9. If the XMIT datasets used SDB, the space requirements would be greatly reduced (I reblocked them after they were staged).
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." Bugs Bunny Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025 at 2:27 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:47:13 +0000, rpinion865 wrote: > > > Back in 2021, there was a discussion regarding TSO RECEIVE and SDB. There > > was a mention of a > > ZAP to change the default block size from 3120 to SDB. But I could not find > > a link to that zap. Does > > the ZAP exist? If so, where can I find it? I did check www.cbttape.org. But > > I did not see anything in > > there. Thanks in advance. > > In this 21st Century, a hard-coded 3120 should be a reportable defect. > At least, basis for an RFE. > > But, just curious, did you have a version of TRANSMIT/SENDFILE > that generated a troublesome NETDATA file? Which? > > -- > gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
