On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 13:44:11 +0000, rpinion865 wrote: >What I am seeing is all sorts of non-optimum block sizes, most of them are >3120. We are >running a script from ISV which allocates the output dataset using the TSO >ALLOCATE >command (we have hard coded the optimum block size in the ALLOCATE command). >Then the >script issues the RECEIVE command. After the script runs, we see the output >datasets >with non-optimal block sizes. It appears that what we coded in the ALLOCATE >is over-ridden >by RECEIVE. By the way, the CBT ZAP is for the TRANSMIT command. > ... Does CLOSE update the DSCB blocksize of a NETDATA data set which RECEIVE opened for INPUT?
Does that NETDATA file exist on DASD and contain blocks larger than the DCBBLKSI set by RECEIVE? are I/O errors reported when RECEIVE reads such blocks? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
