Regarding the 777 permission, that is a bit hard handed?

In my not so humble opinion, the group needs to be used.

If the owner of the file is Johnny, and the group it is in is backups(just
an example), but Sarah(who is probably Sarah:Sarah) need read access too,
then Sarah need to be added to a secondary group, in my example it is
backups.
something like this:
Before this command is issued, the [ grep backups /etc/group ] command
should NOT show Sarah as part of the backups group, if it does... there is
another problem.
# usermod -a -G backups Sarah
After this command is issued, the [ grep backups /etc/group ] command
should show Sarah as part of the backups group

Having said all that, if the backup group only needs read access, it will
by (owner)7(Group)5(Rest of the World and their pets)5, but if the backup
group needs it all(R,W,E,D), then it will be 775.


Kind Regards

James

Op do 4 jun 2026 om 23:37 schreef Andrew Rowley <
[email protected]>:

> On 4/06/2026 7:49 pm, Robert S. Hansel wrote:
> > It is my understanding that /etc/rc is executed by BPXOINIT at startup.
> If its ID has UID(0), you need not change the Owner.
>
> That's almost certainly true.
>
> However, while it's very unlikely, I think it is possible to run a Java
> task from /etc/rc that could create the directory with another user. So
> it seemed like cheap insurance to explicitly set the owner, then you are
> protected if somehow things change in the future.
>
> --
> Andrew Rowley
> Black Hill Software
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to