> no ASCII-native OSes for the 360/370

Except, of course, OS/360. /s

I love explaining to squatty-box kids how the original hardware had the ASCII 
PSW bit but it was never used, repurposed for S/370. Related: I can't count the 
number of times I've said "31-bit mode" and someone said "You mean 32-bit?" and 
I've had to explain.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jay 
Maynard
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2026 9:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Two TSO terminal I/O from Rexx questions

It would require talking with an ASCII-native host, and I doubt any of them 
ever implemented a 3270 driver. AFAIK, there certainly were no ASCII-native 
OSes for the 360/370 (plus or minus UTS or AIX/370, which ran under VM anyway).

On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 7:40 AM Phil Smith III <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am astounded. Did a ton of 3270 stuff back in the day and have ZERO 
> memory of it ever mentioning ASCII!
>
> Weirdly, it's all over that book--but it never seems to discuss what 
> they mean about using it. There's ONE index entry, which points to an 
> entry about structured fields, where it says simply:
>
> "Note: The use of structured fields requires that the full 8 bits of a 
> byte be used; therefore, WSF is not supported in an ASCII 
> environment."
>
> Makes me wonder if anybody ever used that support?!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to