EXACTLY! Which is why I am asking on the list. Our MQ/CICS SYSPROG has sent a question to IBM. But IBM says we are not licensed for MQ. Strange, since we are paying for it. Although, the MQ/CICS SYSPROG does not seem to be in a hurry to get the question of support resolved.
Richard Pinion "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." Bugs Bunny Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Thursday, July 30th, 2026 at 2:28 PM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> > I feel confident that loading the module into LPA will not > cause any problems, since the module is RENT/REUS. I just > want to make sure. > </snip> > > You might be right that it is OK to place the module into LPA, but being > "confident" is way further than you should be. Not every RENT/REUS module can > be in LPA. And sometimes an application will have dependencies on the > location of its modules. A good rule is that you should not place anyone > else's modules into LPA without explicit indication that it is OK to do so. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design (retired) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
