I loaded the modules into LPA of our TECH LPAR, renamed them in the SCSQAUTH library (was in the STEPLIB of the MQ MSTR and CHIN), and IPLed. The modules are not showing up in SDSF MFM and no nastygrams coming out of MQMSTR or MQCHIN.
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." Bugs Bunny Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Monday, August 3rd, 2026 at 3:57 PM, Peter Vander Woude <[email protected]> wrote: > Doh! > > On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:26:55 +0000, rpinion865 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >9.3 as the title indicates. > > > > > > > >"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > > > >Bugs Bunny > > > >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > > >On Friday, July 31st, 2026 at 3:23 PM, Peter Vander Woude > ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> What version of MQ are you running? > >> > >> The latest is V10, though it just came out. 9.1 is out of support. 9.2 I > >> think is still supported. 9.3 and 9.4 are definitely still supported. > >> > >> Peter > >> > >> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:33:49 +0000, rpinion865 <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >EXACTLY! Which is why I am asking on the list. Our MQ/CICS > >> >SYSPROG has sent a question to IBM. But IBM says we are not > >> >licensed for MQ. Strange, since we are paying for it. Although, > >> >the MQ/CICS SYSPROG does not seem to be in a hurry to get the > >> >question of support resolved. > >> > > >> >Richard Pinion > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit." > >> > > >> >Bugs Bunny > >> > > >> >Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > >> > > >> >On Thursday, July 30th, 2026 at 2:28 PM, Peter Relson > >> ><[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> <snip> > >> >> I feel confident that loading the module into LPA will not > >> >> cause any problems, since the module is RENT/REUS. I just > >> >> want to make sure. > >> >> </snip> > >> >> > >> >> You might be right that it is OK to place the module into LPA, but > >> >> being "confident" is way further than you should be. Not every > >> >> RENT/REUS module can be in LPA. And sometimes an application will have > >> >> dependencies on the location of its modules. A good rule is that you > >> >> should not place anyone else's modules into LPA without explicit > >> >> indication that it is OK to do so. > >> >> > >> >> Peter Relson > >> >> z/OS Core Technology Design (retired) > >> >> > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > >> >> > >> > > >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > >> > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
