In
<caajsdjgzb_vpkhqngvr3_j7vu9yvof3bjqhojhk25sfjypd...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 07/08/2013
at 11:00 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> said:
>But that is not possible. So I'm wondering what syntax should be
>used? I can think of two possibilities.
There's a third easy possibility, but Ze'ev seems to want a permanent
LE environment as well, which makes things much more difficult for all
three.
>The easier to implement would be something like:
>CALL *(REXXPCRE) 'PCRE VARTOPARSE MATCH1 MATCH2 '
That by itself doesn't allow for named captures, although a variation
of it would.
>The more difficult, but "REXXier" way would be to do like SDSF does,
>or z/OS UNIX and set up an ADDRESS PCRE environment. But I would
>then need to figure out the syntax of the PCRE environment commands.
More precisely, you would need to design a syntax that is easy to use
and easy to parse. But you need to do that for all three approaches.
A third way is for the wrapper to be a REXX-aware procedure.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
